Hypotheses

This was due for week 5. 0/5pts

Part 1

Inductive reasoning

It's a way of thinking in which from observing the characteristics of a particular object you assume those qualities to all objects of that kind. The process consist in studying a particular object and with some consistent studies induce that the objects that are similar to that one shares some of his qualities.

Deductive reasoning

It's a way of thinking in which you search for the implications of a certain statement. Given any statement you consider it true and see what does it imply to any particular case.

Part 2

1) Many researchers of the Pyramid of Cheops assume, that to builders (architects) of the Egyptian Pyramids knew the number of golden section and number "Pi" 2) //Probably, the concrete ratio of diameters of a living circle in the geometrical drawing of the Cheops' pyramid has other sizes 3) //It is possible to assume, that the ratio of diameters of a living circle in the geometrical drawing of the Cheops' pyramid turns out as a result of transformation of the living circle when size of the line TA is precisely equal to size of lines CE, DF, LJ, MK. 4) //then it is possible to count that approximately the cubit is equal to the side of a correct diheptagon which is entered within the framework of a correct circle. // 5) it is possible to tell, that people aspired to cipher knowledge of world around in the created objects of human culture for what used proportional parities of a heptagon which expressed absolute knowledge. // //

Usually when you express an hypotheses you are trying to explain something but with certain doubts because you are not sure that what you are telling is the truth, so is really common to find words like: assume, possible, may be, it explains,etc.

Part 3

The Riemann hypothesis:

All non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function have real part 1/2

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis

This zeta function the hypothesis talks about is a function that can predict how many prime numbers lower there are than any given number. This hypothesis is inductive because it dint came from any general statement, it was something that this mathematician saw ,in some of the zeros of that function the real part was 1/2, but since there is no way you can find all the zeros of that function he left it like an hypothesis um prove that even today it hasn't been prove.